Get rid of the ratings
Wed, 06/06/2007 - 23:56
#1
Get rid of the ratings
There are a bunch of people running around in this site who can't get a girl to have sex with them so, instead, they get their kicks by running around giving people low scores. The number of views is probably the best measure of anything regarding quality at this point.
Wed, 06/06/2007 - 23:56
#2
root has fixed this.. the info is now public
Mon, 05/28/2007 - 11:09
#3
At the end of the day, comments and ratings aside, the subs/slaves have been used & enjoyed by their Owners, and THAT is all that matters
No disrespect intended but, why the objections if this is the case?
she was replying to btroll Yukio. her comment above was to try to encourage users/members to still upload their pictures.
Mon, 05/28/2007 - 10:45
#4
Viewing a picture simply as a means of seeing what is displayed does not mean anything in the form of rating. I, for instance, am running at a high resolution, possibly a bit too high for this monitor size, and as a result all the thumbnails are quite small. Enlarging them by clicking is the way to go.
In addition, some days I am more interested in viewing them than other days and that would also reflect on the "ratings" through amount of clicks.
Mon, 05/28/2007 - 06:22
#5
I have no problem with the submittal of photos for a month subscription. I think that's a fair trade and a good way to incourage contributions. Personally, I find it hard to rate the photos. Given what it takes for a person (especially women) to publicly display themselves like that in the first place, I think they all deserve a 10! If there has to be some measure of quality, it should be based on the number of views one gets. Everyone can see the thumbnails but they don't have to open the photo and won't unless it attracts their attention or interest. Pretty democratic actually.
Unless of course the picture viewing is being done by someone who is visually challenged. Anyone out there like that? The fact is the picture is viewed, at least by a few of us, as an art. We look at it, sometimes study it, critique it, complement it, judge it and even rate it. However just because a picture is looked at does not make it better than any other picture in any way. I have seen many pictures here that are done in piss poor taste, have no artistic ability, have no sense of decency in terms of the lifestyle and/or were simply done to humiliate the slave and/or obtain the free months subscription to the gallery. Not my idea of what I want to see but I have to open up the pics to see them. So, your idea is not going to work. Any other ideas?
Mon, 05/28/2007 - 04:39
#6
Ratings
I have no problem with the submittal of photos for a month subscription. I think that's a fair trade and a good way to incourage contributions. Personally, I find it hard to rate the photos. Given what it takes for a person (especially women) to publicly display themselves like that in the first place, I think they all deserve a 10! If there has to be some measure of quality, it should be based on the number of views one gets. Everyone can see the thumbnails but they don't have to open the photo and won't unless it attracts their attention or interest. Pretty democratic actually.
Mon, 05/28/2007 - 01:31
#7
This one agrees, the giving of very low scores seems to be quite deliberate by some people! (1)
There is no "contest" as such, Slave Farm don't give out any prizes for high scores or, most views. (2) There is no end date to the "contest", no ultimate "winner". (3)
Perhaps the contest needs to be re named, as simply "contributed pictures", with ratings removed. (4)
At the end of the day, comments and ratings aside, the subs/slaves have been used & enjoyed by their Owners, and THAT is all that matters
1) I can see that, that could be a problem. I think the "scores given" should be a matter of record. Who gave what score, so to say.
2) As for prizes, I thought, {correct me if I am wrong please}, that slavefarm granted a one month free subscription to the 'galleries' to those who post a total of 5 pictures or more simultaneously. I think that could be counted as a prize.
3) There is a most viewed, and a highest rated though...
4) I can accept the User Contributions however rather than conceding to a new form of the submissions, why don't you try to keep it a contest and see if slavefarm will offer a contest prize more suitable to your taste?
At the end of the day, comments and ratings aside, the subs/slaves have been used & enjoyed by their Owners, and THAT is all that matters
No disrespect intended but, why the objections if this is the case? Personally I rate the picture honestly. That means low or high. I would only hope that others here would have the same credibility and respect. If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. I kinda go by that with the pictures, well at least the ones I see. I don't look at them all.
Sun, 05/27/2007 - 20:41
#8
There are a bunch of people running around in this site who can't get a girl to have sex with them so, instead, they get their kicks by running around giving people low scores. The number of views is probably the best measure of anything regarding quality at this point.
This one agrees, the giving of very low scores seems to be quite deliberate by some people!
There is no "contest" as such, Slave Farm don't give out any prizes for high scores or, most views. There is no end date to the "contest", no ultimate "winner".
Perhaps the contest needs to be re named, as simply "contributed pictures", with ratings removed.
The Masters generously take the time to upload pictures of their subs/slaves, chosing to let A/all enjoy...... if a part of the lifestyle depicted is not of interest to particular viewers, they simply need not look!
At the end of the day, comments and ratings aside, the subs/slaves have been used & enjoyed by their Owners, and THAT is all that matters
Sun, 05/27/2007 - 15:33
#9
He is talking about the picture posts in the contest area
Sun, 05/27/2007 - 15:32
#10
Scores?? Views?? What are you referring to?